¿Para qué llaman los pacientes?: evaluación de consultas telefónicas no urgentes en Atención Primaria / What do patients call for? Evaluation of non-urgent telephone consultations in Primary Care

OBJETIVO: Conocer el uso de las consultas telefónicas no urgentes en medicina de familia, perfil de usuario y factores asociados a su utilización. Comprobar motivos, idoneidad de las llamadas y capacidad de resolución. DISEÑO: Estudio descriptivo transversal. EMPLAZAMIENTO: Zona Básica de Salud urbana. PARTICIPANTES: Todas las llamadas realizadas por ≥ 14 años incluidas en la agenda de consulta telefónica no urgente de tres cupos médicos, durante los meses de septiembre, octubre y noviembre de 2017. MEDICIONES PRINCIPALES: Proporción de consultas telefónicas no urgentes respecto al total, cuantificación de los sujetos, idoneidad de las llamadas y capacidad de resolución. Variables independientes: perfil del usuario (sociodemográficas, Índice de Charlson, polimedicación y uso de servicios sanitarios) y motivos. Análisis multivariante para determinar posibles factores asociados al uso de las llamadas. RESULTADOS: De 6050 citas atendidas, 259 fueron telefónicas (4,28 %; IC95 %: 3,80-4,82) de 184 sujetos. Edad media de 64,6 años (DE: 20,1). El 69,6 % mujeres. Presentaban Índice de Charlson severo el 10,3 %, consumían ≥ 5 fármacos el 59,2 %. Hubo 294 motivos: renovación de recetas (45,9 %) y consultas clínicas (20,9 %, sobre todo osteomusculares). Se resolvieron el 80,5 % de los motivos. Consultas idóneas fueron 211 (81,5 %). Mediante análisis multivariante realizar ≥ 2 llamadas se asoció de modo independiente con: menor número de pacientes visitados/día de la llamada (OR:1,1; p=0,044), mayor número de fármacos usados (OR=1,25; p=0,006) y mayor número de ingresos hospitalarios/último año (OR=2,93; p=0,021). CONCLUSIONES: En nuestro entorno las consultas telefónicas no urgentes representan una proporción baja de la actividad del médico de familia. Sin embargo, parecen tener elevada idoneidad y capacidad de resolución. Sería necesario cuantificar su impacto en la demanda presencial

OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of non-urgent telephone consultations in family medicine, the user profile, and the factors associated with its use. To check reasons, suitability of phone calls and resolution capacity. DESIGN: Descriptive, cross-sectional study. LOCATION: Urban Primary Healthcare Area. PARTICIPANTS: All phone calls made by persons ≥ 14 years old included in the non-urgent telephone consultation schedule of three doctor's rosters, during September, October and November 2017. MAIN MEASURES: Proportion of non-urgent phone consultations to total calls, quantification of persons, suitability of phone calls, and resolution capacity. Independent variables: user profile (socio-demographic characteristics, Charlson Index, polypharmacy, and use of healthcare services) and reasons for the call. Multivariate analysis to determine possible factors associated with the use of telephone calls. RESULTS: 259 out of 6,050 consultations were telephone calls (4.28%; 95% CI: 3.80-4.82) from 184 persons. The average age was 64.6 (SD: 20.1), 69.6% women. 10.3% presented severe Charlson Index, 59.2% used ≥ 5 drugs. There were 294 reasons: prescription renewal (45.9%) and clinical consultations (20.9%, especially musculoskeletal). 80.5% of reasons were resolved. 211 were suitable consultations (81.5%). Through multivariate analysis, making ≥ 2 calls was independently associated with: lower number of patients seen/day of the call (OR: 1.1; p=0.044), higher number of drugs used (OR: 1.25; p=0.006), and higher number of hospital admissions/last year (OR: 2.93; p=0.021). CONCLUSIONS: In our environment, non-urgent telephone consultations represent a low propor-tion of the family doctor's activity. However, they seem to have high suitability and resolution capacity. It would be necessary to quantify their impact on face-to-face consultations

Eficacia de una estrategia combinada para mejorar el control del colesterol unido a lipoproteínas de baja densidad en pacientes con hipercolesterolemia. Ensayo clínico aleatorizado / Efficacy of a combined strategy to improve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol control among patients with hypercholesterolemia: a randomized clinical trial

Introducción y objetivos: Intervenciones diferentes pueden mejorar el control del colesterol unido a lipoproteínas de baja densidad (cLDL). El objetivo principal era evaluar la eficacia de una intervención combinada para mejorar el control del cLDL de pacientes con hipercolesterolemia. También se evaluó su eficacia para mejorar el cumplimiento (farmacológico, dieta y ejercicio). Métodos: Ensayo clínico aleatorizado, de grupos paralelos y multicéntrico (atención primaria) que incluyó a 358 adultos diagnosticados de hipercolesterolemia con tratamiento previo farmacológico o no. Se comparó a 178 sujetos que recibieron intervención combinada (material escrito, tarjetas autocumplimentadas y mensajes al móvil) frente a 178 controles. La variable principal de resultado fue la proporción de sujetos con adecuado control del cLDL (valores recomendados en las guías europeas de dislipemias y riesgo cardiovascular) a los 24 meses. Resultados: El grupo de intervención mostró una reducción media del cLDL significativamente superior a los 24 meses respecto al control, 23,8 mg/dl (IC95%, 17,5-30,1) y 14,6 mg/dl (IC95%, 8,9-20,4), respectivamente (p = 0,034). El promedio de la reducción del cLDL fue del 13,1 ± 28,6%. La proporción de sujetos con adecuado control al año fue significativamente superior en el grupo de intervención (43,7 frente a 30,1%; p = 0,011; RR = 1,46). En el grupo de intervención, el cumplimiento farmacológico fue significativamente superior (77,2 frente a 64,1%; p = 0,029) y de la práctica de ejercicio (64,9 frente a 35,8%; p < 0,001), aunque no de la dieta. Conclusiones: La intervención combinada consigue una reducción significativa de las cifras de cLDL (superior al 13% al cabo de 2 años) y mejora el grado de control de pacientes con hipercolesterolemia al año (AU)

Introduction and objectives: Several interventions can improve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control. Our main objective was to evaluate the efficacy of a combined intervention to improve LDL-C control in patients with hypercholesterolemia. The study also assessed the efficacy of the intervention in improving adherence (pharmacological, diet, and exercise). Methods: A multicenter, parallel group, randomized clinical trial (primary care) was conducted in 358 adults diagnosed with hypercholesterolemia, whether receiving prior drug therapy or not. We compared 178 participants who received the combined intervention (written material, self-completed registration cards, and messages to mobile telephones) with 178 controls. The main outcome variable was the proportion of participants with adequate LDL-C control (target levels of the European guidelines on dyslipidemia and cardiovascular risk) at 24 months. Results: At 24 months, the mean reduction in LDL-C was significantly higher in the intervention group (23.8 mg/dL [95%CI, 17.5-30.1]) than in the control group (14.6 mg/dL [95%CI, 8.9-20.4]; P = .034). The mean LDL-C decrease was 13.1% ± 28.6%. At 1 year, the proportion of participants with adequate control was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (43.7% vs 30.1%; P = .011; RR, 1.46). Adherence was significantly higher in the intervention group, both to drug therapy (77.2% vs 64.1%; P = .029) and exercise (64.9% vs 35.8; P < .001), but not to diet. Conclusions: The combined intervention significantly reduced LDL-C (by more than 13% at 2 years) and improved the degree of LDL-C control in patients with hypercholesterolemia at 1 year (AU)

Efficacy of a Combined Strategy to Improve Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Control Among Patients With Hypercholesterolemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Several interventions can improve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control. Our main objective was to evaluate the efficacy of a combined intervention to improve LDL-C control in patients with hypercholesterolemia. The study also assessed the efficacy of the intervention in improving adherence (pharmacological, diet, and exercise). METHODS: A multicenter, parallel group, randomized clinical trial (primary care) was conducted in 358 adults diagnosed with hypercholesterolemia, whether receiving prior drug therapy or not. We compared 178 participants who received the combined intervention (written material, self-completed registration cards, and messages to mobile telephones) with 178 controls. The main outcome variable was the proportion of participants with adequate LDL-C control (target levels of the European guidelines on dyslipidemia and cardiovascular risk) at 24 months. RESULTS: At 24 months, the mean reduction in LDL-C was significantly higher in the intervention group (23.8mg/dL [95%CI, 17.5-30.1]) than in the control group (14.6mg/dL [95%CI, 8.9-20.4]; P=.034). The mean LDL-C decrease was 13.1%±28.6%. At 1 year, the proportion of participants with adequate control was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (43.7% vs 30.1%; P=.011; RR, 1.46). Adherence was significantly higher in the intervention group, both to drug therapy (77.2% vs 64.1%; P=.029) and exercise (64.9% vs 35.8; P<.001), but not to diet. CONCLUSIONS: The combined intervention significantly reduced LDL-C (by more than 13% at 2 years) and improved the degree of LDL-C control in patients with hypercholesterolemia at 1 year.

Consumo de ansiolíticos e hipnóticos y factores asociados en las personas mayores / Determining factors for the use of anxiolytic and hypnotic drugs in the elderly

Introducción. Estimar la prevalencia del consumo de ansiolíticos e hipnóticos referido por los mayores de 65 años e identificar posibles factores condicionantes del citado uso. Material y métodos. Estudio transversal. La población de estudio fue de 1.161 sujetos de ≥65 años no institucionalizados con suficiente capacidad para llevar a cabo una entrevista personal. Selección mediante muestreo aleatorizado simple del listado de tarjeta sanitaria. Las principales variables evaluadas incluyeron: consumo referido de ansiolíticos/hipnóticos y otros fármacos (según el sistema de clasificación ATC), estado anímico (GDS-VE), estado cognitivo (cuestionario Pfeiffer), valoración física-funcional sobre actividades básicas de la vida diaria (índice de Katz), problemas de salud (clasificación CIAP-2 de la WONCA) y variables sociodemográficas. Resultados. La prevalencia de uso referido de ansiolíticos/hipnóticos fue del 16,6% (IC 95%: 14,5-18,7). El 90,5% fueron benzodiacepinas (BZD), fundamentalmente lorazepam (39,4% de las BZD). Las BZD de vida media prolongada supusieron el 24,7% de todas. Los hipnóticos representaron el 27,5% de los ansiolíticos/hipnóticos. El uso de ansiolíticos/hipnóticos se asoció independientemente con consumir otros fármacos no psicotrópicos (OR: 6,8; IC 95%: 2,1-22,0), presentar depresión establecida (OR: 2,5; IC 95%: 1,0-5,9), presentar 4 o más problemas de salud (OR: 2,0; IC 95%: 1,4-2,9), ser mujer (OR: 2,1; IC 95%: 1,5-3,1) y ser dependiente para las actividades básicas de la vida diaria (OR: 1,8; IC 95%: 1,1-2,9). Conclusiones. La prevalencia de uso de ansiolíticos/hipnóticos es elevada en mayores de Albacete. Diversos factores han sido identificados como potenciales condicionantes de su utilización. Sería importante mejorar el conocimiento sobre el mal uso de estos fármacos con el fin de desarrollar estrategias de prescripción efectivas y seguras (AU)

Introduction. To estimate the prevalence of self-reported anxiety/hypnotics use in adults 65 years and older and identify potential factors that determine the use of these drugs. Material and Methods. Cross-sectional study conducted on a study population of 1,161 non-institutionalised adults 65 years old and older with enough ability to conduct a personal interview. Participants were randomly selected from health care registers. The main outcomes of interest included consumption of anxiolytics, hypnotics and other drugs (filed by ATC classification system), mood (based on the Yesavage geriatric depression scale), cognitive status (Pfeiffer questionnaire), physical-functional assessment of basic activities of daily living (Katz index), health problems (ICPC-2 classification WONCA), and sociodemographic variables. Results. The prevalence of self-reported anxiety/hypnotics consumption was 16.6% (95% CI: 14.5 - 18.7), of which 90.5% were benzodiazepines (BZD), mainly lorazepam (39.4% of BZD). Long half-life BZD accounted for 24.7% of BZD. Hypnotics accounted for 27.5% of anxiolytics/hypnotics. The use of sedatives/hypnotics was independently associated with other drugs (non-psychotropics) consumption (OR 6.8, 95% CI: 2.1-22.0), presence of established depression (OR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.0 -5.9), presence of 4 or more comorbidities (OR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.4-2.9), being female (OR 2.1, 95% CI: 1.5-3.1) and being dependent for basic activities of daily living (OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1-2.9). Conclusions. The prevalence of sedatives/hypnotics use in the elderly from Albacete is high. Several factors were identified as potential determinants of sedatives/hypnotics use in our study population. It will be important to evaluate the misuse of these drugs in order to develop effective, efficient and safe prescription strategies (AU)

Uso de los nuevos anticoagulantes orales en atención primaria. Calidad de la prescripción / Use of new oral anticoagulants in primary care. Quality of prescription

Objetivo: Evaluar la calidad de la prescripción de los nuevos anticoagulantes orales. Identificar posibles factores asociados a su utilización inadecuada. Diseño: Estudio descriptivo transversal. Emplazamiento: Zona Básica de Salud urbana. Participantes: Todos los pacientes que consumieron nuevos anticoagulantes orales (NACO) durante 2015 (153 sujetos). Mediciones Principales: Adecuación de la prescripción a las recomendaciones de la Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS). Otras variables: NACO prescrito (clasificación ATC), indicación y duración del tratamiento, prescriptor, Índice de Charlson, polimedicación (5 o más fármacos), uso de servicios sanitarios y variables sociodemográficas. Análisis multivariante para determinar posibles factores asociados al uso inadecuado. Resultados: 145 sujetos incluidos (23,8 % del total de usuarios de anticoagulantes orales). Edad media 76 años (DE:11,4), un 50,3 % mujeres. Rivaroxaban el más prescrito (41,4 %). Indicación y prescriptor principal: fibrilación auricular no valvular -FANV- (93,1 % de casos) y cardiólogos (71,7 %). Mediana de uso de 20 meses (rango intercuartil: 8 a 32). Utilizaban acenocumarol el 46,9 % de pacientes y el motivo habitual de cambio: mal control del INR. En el 74,1 % (100 casos) (IC 95 %: 65,8 - 81,2) el uso global de NACO (pacientes con FANV) fue inadecuado. Variables asociadas al uso inadecuado: no prescribir de inicio el NACO (OR: 7,0; IC 95 %: 1,8 - 27,1) y la mayor duración del tratamiento anticoagulante (OR: 2,4; IC 95 %: 1,3 - 4,5). Conclusiones: En nuestro entorno una de cada cuatro prescripciones de los nuevos anticoagulantes, en pacientes con FANV, sigue las recomendaciones de la AEMPS. Debemos estar alerta ante posibles riesgos de este elevado uso inadecuado (AU)

Objective: To assess the quality of prescription of the new oral anticoagulants. To identify possible factors associated with its inappropriate use. Design: Descriptive cross-sectional study. Location: Urban primary healthcare district. Participants: All patients who used new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) during 2015 (153 subjects). Main measurements: Prescription compliance to the recommendations of the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS). Other variables: NOAC prescribed (ATC classification), indication and duration of treatment, prescriber, Charlson index, polypharmacy (5 or more drugs), use of healthcare services, and socio-demographic variables. Multivariate analysis to determine possible factors associated with inappropriate use. Results: 145 subjects were included (23.8 % of the total users of oral anticoagulants). Average age 76 years (SD:11.4), 50.3 % were women. Rivaroxaban the most prescribed (41.4 %). Indication and usual prescriber: non-valvular atrial fibrillation - NVAF - (93.1 % of cases) and cardiologists (71.7 %). The median of use was 20 months (interquartile range: 8 to 32). 46.9 % of patients used acenocoumarol, and the usual reason for the change was poor INR control. In 74.1 %(100 cases) (CI 95 %: 65.8 - 81.2) the global use of NOAC, in patients with NVAF, was inappropriate. Variables associated with inappropriate use: not to prescribe NOAC from the beginning (OR: 7.0; CI 95 %: 1.8 - 27.1) and longer duration of anticoagulant therapy (OR: 2.4; CI 95 %: 1.3 - 4.5).Conclusion: . In our environment, one of every four prescriptions of new anticoagulants, in patients with NVAF, follows the recommendations of the AEMPS. We must be vigilant against possible risks of this high inappropriate use (AU)

[Determining factors for the use of anxiolytic and hypnotic drugs in the elderly]. / Consumo de ansiolíticos e hipnóticos y factores asociados en las personas mayores.

INTRODUCTION: To estimate the prevalence of self-reported anxiety/hypnotics use in adults 65 years and older and identify potential factors that determine the use of these drugs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted on a study population of 1,161 non-institutionalised adults 65 years old and older with enough ability to conduct a personal interview. Participants were randomly selected from health care registers. The main outcomes of interest included consumption of anxiolytics, hypnotics and other drugs (filed by ATC classification system), mood (based on the Yesavage geriatric depression scale), cognitive status (Pfeiffer questionnaire), physical-functional assessment of basic activities of daily living (Katz index), health problems (ICPC-2 classification WONCA), and sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: The prevalence of self-reported anxiety/hypnotics consumption was 16.6% (95% CI: 14.5 - 18.7), of which 90.5% were benzodiazepines (BZD), mainly lorazepam (39.4% of BZD). Long half-life BZD accounted for 24.7% of BZD. Hypnotics accounted for 27.5% of anxiolytics/hypnotics. The use of sedatives/hypnotics was independently associated with other drugs (non-psychotropics) consumption (OR 6.8, 95% CI: 2.1-22.0), presence of established depression (OR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.0 -5.9), presence of 4 or more comorbidities (OR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.4-2.9), being female (OR 2.1, 95% CI: 1.5-3.1) and being dependent for basic activities of daily living (OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1-2.9). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of sedatives/hypnotics use in the elderly from Albacete is high. Several factors were identified as potential determinants of sedatives/hypnotics use in our study population. It will be important to evaluate the misuse of these drugs in order to develop effective, efficient and safe prescription strategies.

Predictors for choosing the specialty of Family Medicine from undergraduate knowledge and attitudes.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: A cold climate towards primary care (PC) within medical academia could form a barrier against choosing family medicine (FM) as a career option. This study was designed to determine whether medical students' knowledge of and attitudes towards FM predicted their career choice. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cohort study conducted at two different medical schools. METHODS: After completing a PC course at the Albacete Medical School in 2005-2006, 81 second-year students were asked to give responses to a questionnaire. In their sixth year (2009-2010), 79 students in Albacete and 42 in Seville (taken as an unexposed cohort) were asked to give responses too. Their choice of specialty was investigated in 2011. RESULTS: In Albacete, the questionnaire was answered by 79 second-year and 76 sixth-year students; in Seville, it was answered by 26 sixth-year students. After completing the PC course, 69.3% said they would like to become a family doctor. This percentage decreased to 40.3% at the end of the undergraduate course (P < 0.0001). In the sixth year, the attitudes towards FM worsened, yet these were significantly more favorable than those in Seville. Only 12 students chose FM; they obtained significantly worse scores in their specialty selection examination than their peers (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In the Albacete Medical School, the students' opinion about FM worsened over the undergraduate course, although it was still better than the Seville students' stance. In any case, FM was seen to be a minority option.

Prevalence of psychotropic medication use and associated factors in the elderly

Background and Objectives: The object of our study was to estimate the prevalence of psychotropic drug use among non-institutionalised elderly people 65 years or older and identify possible conditioning factors. Methods: A cross-sectional, observational study was carried out of 1161 subjects aged 65 years and older. Participants were randomly selected from health care registry listings. The main outcomes of interest were based on self-reporting and included consumption of psychotropic and other drugs (filed by the ATC Classification System), mood (based on the GDS-VE), cognitive status (Pfeiffer Questionnaire), physical-functional assessment based on Katz score, health problems (ICPC-2 classification WONCA) and socio-demographic variables. Results: The prevalence of self-reported psychotropic drug consumption was 20.5% (95% CI: 18.2 to 22.8). Anxiolytics and hypnotics were consumed by 16.6% of the elderly, antidepressants by 7.0% and antipsychotics by only 2.1%. In multivariate logistical analyses, the use of psychotropics was independently associated with other drug consumption (nonpsychotropics), (OR: 4.0, 95% CI: 1.7 to 9.5), presence of established depression (OR: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.3 to 7.6), presence of 4 or more comorbidities (OR: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.9 to 3.8), being female (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.5 to 3.0) and being dependent for basic activities of daily living (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.0 to 2.6). Conclusions: The prevalence of psychotropic drug use among the elderly from Albacete is high. Several factors were identified as potential determinants of psychotropic drug use. It will be important to evaluate the misuse of these drugs in order to inform effective, efficient and safe prescription strategies (AU)

No disponible

Predictors for choosing the specialty of Family Medicine from undergraduate knowledge and attitudes / Preditores da escolha da especialidade Medicina de Família a partir de competências e atitudes de alunos de graduação

ABSTRACT: CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: A cold climate towards primary care (PC) within medical academia could form a barrier against choosing family medicine (FM) as a career option. This study was designed to determine whether medical students' knowledge of and attitudes towards FM predicted their career choice. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cohort study conducted at two different medical schools. METHODS: After completing a PC course at the Albacete Medical School in 2005-2006, 81 second-year students were asked to give responses to a questionnaire. In their sixth year (2009-2010), 79 students in Albacete and 42 in Seville (taken as an unexposed cohort) were asked to give responses too. Their choice of specialty was investigated in 2011. RESULTS: In Albacete, the questionnaire was answered by 79 second-year and 76 sixth-year students; in Seville, it was answered by 26 sixth-year students. After completing the PC course, 69.3% said they would like to become a family doctor. This percentage decreased to 40.3% at the end of the undergraduate course (P < 0.0001). In the sixth year, the attitudes towards FM worsened, yet these were significantly more favorable than those in Seville. Only 12 students chose FM; they obtained significantly worse scores in their specialty selection examination than their peers (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In the Albacete Medical School, the students' opinion about FM worsened over the undergraduate course, although it was still better than the Seville students' stance. In any case, FM was seen to be a minority option.

RESUMO CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: Um clima frio para a atenção primária na academia médica constitui uma barreira para escolher Medicina de Família (MF) como opção de carreira. Este estudo foi concebido para determinar se o conhecimento e as atitudes dos estudantes de medicina em relação à MF predizem a escolha da carreira. TIPO DE ESTUDO E LOCAL: Estudo de coorte realizado em duas faculdades de medicina. MÉTODOS: Depois de terem completado um curso de Cuidados Primários na Faculdade de Medicina de Albacete, em 2005-2006, 81 alunos do segundo ano foram convidados a responder a um questionário. No seu sexto ano (2009-2010), 79 estudantes de Albacete assim como 42 de Sevilha, tomados como coorte não exposta, foram convidados a responder também. Todos eles foram investigados sobre a escolha da especialidade em 2011. RESULTADOS: Em Albacete, 79 e 76 estudantes responderam no segundo e sexto anos, respectivamente, e 26 em Sevilha. Depois de terem concluído o curso de cuidados primários, 69,3% disseram que gostariam de se tornar médicos de família. Esta percentagem diminuiu para 40,3% no final da graduação (P < 0,0001). No sexto ano, as atitudes com relação à MF pioraram, mas estas foram significativamente mais favoráveis do que as de Sevilla. Apenas 12 alunos escolheram a MF; eles obtiveram pontuação significativamente piores no exame do que seus pares (P < 0,0001). CONCLUSÃO: Na Faculdade de Medicina de Albacete, a opinião dos alunos sobre a MF ao longo da graduação piorou; contudo ainda era melhor que as dos estudantes de Sevilha. Em qualquer caso, MF foi opção minoritária.

Cribado para el trastorno bipolar en pacientes de atención primaria que presentan síntomas psicológicos / Screening for bipolar disorder in Primary Care patients with psychological symptoms

OBJETIVO: Estimar la proporción de resultados positivos en el cribado del trastorno bipolar (TB) entre los pacientes de atención primaria que consultan por problemas de naturaleza psicológica, y analizar sus características. DISEÑO: Estudio descriptivo transversal multicéntrico. Emplazamiento: Diecinueve consultas de atención primaria en diferentes comunidades autónomas. PACIENTES: La muestra estuvo formada por 360 pacientes consecutivos de atención primaria con edades entre 18 y 70 años visitados por síntomas psicológicos. Mediciones: El cribado para TB se realizó mediante el Mood Disorders Questionnaire. Se obtuvieron datos sobre calidad de vida (EuroQol-5D), impacto funcional (Sheehan Disability Inventory) y, mediante revisión de historias clínicas, datos sobre comorbilidad psiquiátrica y consumo de psicofármacos. RESULTADOS: Se obtuvo una proporción de cribados positivos del 11,9% (IC 95%: 8,8-15,7%). Solo en 2 de estos pacientes estaba registrado el diagnóstico de TB, y aunque más de la mitad recibían tratamiento con antidepresivos, solo 2 recibían tratamiento con estabilizadores del estado de ánimo. El cribado positivo se asocia a peor calidad de vida, a disfunción laboral, social y familiar, y a mayor estrés percibido. CONCLUSIONES: El cribado del TB en pacientes de atención primaria con otros problemas psicológicos da lugar a una notable proporción de resultados positivos, lo que indica que puede haber una prevalencia relevante de pacientes con TB, la mayor parte de ellos no diagnosticados y no tratados adecuadamente. Es necesario profundizar en la investigación para determinar el eventual papel que puede o debe asumir la atención primaria en la detección, el diagnóstico o el manejo de este trastorno

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the proportion of positive results in the screening of bipolar disorder (BD) among primary care patients presenting with psychological symptoms, and to analyze their characteristics. DESIGN: Multicenter cross-sectional study. Settings: Nineteen Primary Care clinics in different Spanish regions. PATIENTS: A total of 360 consecutive primary care patients aged 18 to 70, presenting with psychological symptoms. Measurements: Screening for BP was performed by means of the Mood Disorders Questionnaire. Data on quality of life (EuroQol-5D) and functional impairment (Sheehan Disability Inventory) were obtained. Data on psychiatric comorbidity and data on the use of psychotropic medication were acquired by review of medical records. RESULTS: Of the patients screened, 11.9% were positive (95% CI: 8.8%-15.7%). Only two patients had a diagnosis of BP in their clinical records and, although more than half received treatment with antidepressants, only two received treatment with mood stabilizers. Positive screening is associated with work, social and family dysfunction, greater perceived stress and poor quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: BD screening in primary care patients with psychological problems leads to a striking proportion of positive results, indicating that there may be a significant prevalence of BP patients, most of them undiagnosed and untreated. Further research is needed to determine the role that Primary Care can or should assume in the screening, diagnosis and management of this disorder

[Choice of Family Medicine at the exams for Spanish resident doctors in 2011 and 2013]. / Elección de Medicina Familiar en los exámenes para médicos residentes españoles de 2011 y 2013.

BACKGROUND: Family Medicine (FM) is regarded as one of the specialities less interesting to those who choose for resident physicians (MIR) in Spain. Our objective is to know the priority given to the choice of FM in 2011 and 2013 MIR exams, and what factors might be associated with this choice. METHODS: We obtained information on the website of the Ministry of Health for the graduates who could choose a speciality (11552 y 9182). The variables analyzed were: number obtained in the opposition, sex, speciality chosen, chosen city, medical school where they studied (for 117 and 155 students of a previous cohort study). We calculated the probability of choice of FM in relation to the order number in the exam and the other variables (Kaplan-Meier). RESULTS: 1963 and 1772 chose FM, respectively in 2011 and 2013. The median of the order number to choose FM was 7894 (95%CI:7720-8068) and 6561 (95%CI:6442-6680). There were gender differences, as women chose FM with fewer number and a higher proportion (p<0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Graduates enrolled in the MIR exam have not special preference for FM. Women show a greater interest in this speciality.

Introducción: la Medicina Familiar (MF) está considerada entre las especialidades que menos interesan a quienes optan por ser médicos internos residentes (MIR) en España. Nuestro objetivo es describir la prioridad concedida a la elección de MF en las convocatorias MIR 2011 y 2013, y qué factores podrían estar asociados con esta elección. Métodos: de la web del Ministerio de Sanidad de España se obtuvo información de los opositores que optaron a plaza (11552 y 9182). Las variables analizadas han sido: número obtenido en la oposición, sexo, especialidad elegida, ciudad elegida, facultad donde estudiaron (para 117 y 155 en un estudio de cohorte previo). Se calculó la probabilidad de elección de MF en relación con el número de orden en la oposición y otras variables (Kaplan-Meier). Resultados: la MF fue elegida por 1963 y 1772, respectivamente en 2011 y 2013. La mediana del número en la oposición para elegir MF fue 7894 (IC 95 % 7720-8068) y 6561 (IC 95 % 6442-6680). Existían diferencias por sexo: las mujeres elegían MF con menor número y en mayor proporción (p < 0.00001). Conclusiones: los opositores MIR no tienen una especial preferencia por la MF. Las mujeres muestran un mayor interés por esta especialidad.

Effectiveness of a combined strategy to improve therapeutic compliance and degree of control among patients with hypercholesterolaemia: a randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: In subjects with hypercholesterolaemia, cholesterol values remain above guideline levels. One of the limiting factors to the achievement of goals in such patients is therapeutic non-adherence. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of an intervention designed to improve control of hypercholesterolaemic patients, consisting of a combined strategy that would include the delivery of printed information, treatment-compliance check cards and the dispatch of text messages as complementary measures in support of the intervention at the general practitioner's practice. METHODS/DESIGN: A randomised, parallel-group clinical trial will be conducted at the family medicine outpatient facilities of eight health centres in three of Spain's Autonomous Regions (Comunidades Autónomas), covering a total of 358 subjects aged 18 years or over with diagnosis of hypercholesterolaemia. Patients in the intervention group will be supplied with printed material with information on the disease and its management, mobile-telephone text messages with guideline summaries, reminders of forthcoming appointments and/or arrangements for making new appointments in the event of non-attendance, and self-report cards to check compliance with recommendations. Both groups -intervention and control- will receive routine recommendations from their physicians in accordance with current European clinical practice guidelines for hypercholesterolaemia and cardiovascular risk management. As regards the measurements to be made, the main variable is the proportion of subjects who attain the low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels set as a target across a follow-up period of 24 months. The secondary variables are as follows: adherence to recommendations on lifestyle and adherence to drug treatment; variation in lipid profiles and cardiovascular risk levels; appearance of cardiovascular events; physical activity; food consumption; smoking habit; anthropometric measures; blood pressure; health problems; use of hypolipidaemic agents; socio-demographic data; beliefs and expectations about preventive recommendations; and degree of satisfaction with the combined strategy. DISCUSSION: Should this intervention prove effective, a recommendation could be issued on the application of this combined strategy to subjects with hypercholesterolaemia. It is a simple, relatively inexpensive intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02314663.

[Screening for bipolar disorder in primary care patients with psychological symptoms]. / Cribado para el trastorno bipolar en pacientes de atención primaria que presentan síntomas psicológicos.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the proportion of positive results in the screening of bipolar disorder (BD) among primary care patients presenting with psychological symptoms, and to analyze their characteristics. DESIGN: Multicenter cross-sectional study. SETTINGS: Nineteen Primary Care clinics in different Spanish regions. PATIENTS: A total of 360 consecutive primary care patients aged 18 to 70, presenting with psychological symptoms. MEASUREMENTS: Screening for BP was performed by means of the Mood Disorders Questionnaire. Data on quality of life (EuroQol-5D) and functional impairment (Sheehan Disability Inventory) were obtained. Data on psychiatric comorbidity and data on the use of psychotropic medication were acquired by review of medical records. RESULTS: Of the patients screened, 11.9% were positive (95%CI: 8.8%-15.7%). Only two patients had a diagnosis of BP in their clinical records and, although more than half received treatment with antidepressants, only two received treatment with mood stabilizers. Positive screening is associated with work, social and family dysfunction, greater perceived stress and poor quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: BD screening in primary care patients with psychological problems leads to a striking proportion of positive results, indicating that there may be a significant prevalence of BP patients, most of them undiagnosed and untreated. Further research is needed to determine the role that Primary Care can or should assume in the screening, diagnosis and management of this disorder.

Understanding insomnia in older adults.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to determine the true frequency of primary insomnia (PI), sleep disorder related to another mental disorder (SDMD) and sleep disorder due to a general medical condition (SDMC) in older adults and to establish their differentiating characteristics. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. Participants were randomly selected samples of 951 subjects who are 65 years or older. Main measures were as follows: presence (according to DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria) of PI, SDMD, SDMC or other sleep disorders, co-morbidity and psychotropic consumption. RESULTS: Of the subjects, 36.1% reported having sleep problems (95% CI: 33.0-39.2) and 37.0% reported regularly consuming a psychotropic drug. The prevalence of PI was 8.9% (95% CI: 7.1-11.0), and according to the criteria for differential diagnosis, the prevalence of SDMD was 9.3% (95% CI: 7.5-11.4) and that of SDMC was 7.0% (95%CI: 5.4-8.9). A higher percentage of PI subjects had problems in falling asleep on most days (52.5%), had frequent night-time awakenings (66.3%) and early awakenings (51.3%). In subjects with any type of insomnia, the variables that showed a statistically significant association were female gender (OR: 2.21), consumption of psychotropic drugs (OR: 1.83), presence of four or more health problems (OR: 1.88) and being single, widowed or divorced (OR: 1.43). CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide a true picture of the prevalence of insomnia in older adults on the basis of diagnostic criteria and indicate that it is a widespread, significant health problem. The peculiarities of PI, SDMD and SDMC need to be appropriately differentiated in clinical practice, and each needs a different approach to obtain the best outcome.

Conocimientos sobre violencia de género de la población que consulta en Atención Primaria / Knowledge of gender-based violence in the population seen in Primary Care

Objetivo: Determinar conocimientos y actitudes hacia la violencia de género de la población consultante en Atención Primaria y su relación con factores sociodemográficos y experiencias personales.DiseñoEstudio descriptivo transversal.EmplazamientoCentros de Salud urbanos.ParticipantesPacientes ≥ 18 años que acuden a consulta de Atención Primaria.Mediciones principalesSe utilizó un cuestionario que incluía preguntas relativas a conocimientos, actitudes y experiencias vividas en relación con la violencia de género y en el ámbito doméstico, y que también recogía edad, sexo, nivel de estudios, estado civil y detección de experiencias personales de violencia de género mediante la versión corta del Woman Abuse Screening Tool (WAST).ResultadosRespondieron 673 personas, de 18-86 años, con un 68% de mujeres. Solo un 18,2% tenía un adecuado conocimiento sobre quién se considera que ejerce la violencia de género. La mitad de los participantes consideraban que la violencia de género incluía lesiones físicas, psicológicas, cohibición de libertad y violación. A través de un análisis de regresión logística se encontró una asociación independiente con el conocimiento de la respuesta correcta sobre qué es la violencia de género del estado civil, siendo menos probable en los casados con respecto a los viudos (OR: 0,28; IC 95%: 0,11-0,72) considerar que la violencia de género implica lesión física (OR: 2,55; IC 95%: 1,28-5,08), pero no lesiones psicológicas (OR: 0,52; IC 95%: 0,28-0,96), y no dar la respuesta correcta sobre qué es la violencia doméstica (OR: 0,06; IC 95%: 0,03-0,12).ConclusionesExiste una gran dispersión en las respuestas con relación a qué consideran los pacientes que es la violencia de género y qué aspectos abarca(AU)

Objective: To determine the knowledge and attitudes towards gender-based violence in the Primary Care patient population and their relationship with sociodemographic factors and personal experience.DesignA descriptive, cross-sectional study.SettingUrban Health Centres.ParticipantsPatients ≥18 years-old who were seen in a Primary Care clinic.Materials and methodA questionnaire was used that included questions associated with knowledge, attitudes and experience of gender-based violence in the domestic environment. Variables such as, age, sex, education level, marital state were recorded, as well as the detection of personal experiences of Gender-Based Violence using the short Woman Abuse Screening Tool (WAST).ResultsA total of 673 people, from 18- 86 years, responded, of which 68% were women. Only 18.2% had sufficient knowledge on who is considered to exercise gender-based violence. Half of the participants believed that gender-based violence included physical and psychological injuries, inhibition of freedom and rape. In the logistic regression analysis an independent relationship was found with the knowledge of the correct response on what is gender-based violence by marital state, being less likely in married people as regards widowers (OR: 0.28; CI 95%: 0.11-0.72), to consider that gender-based violence involves physical injury (OR: 2.55; CI 95%: 1.28-5.08), but not psychological injury (OR: 0.52; CI 95%: 0.28-0.96), and not giving the correct response on what is domestic violence (OR:0.06; CI 95%: 0.03-0.12).ConclusionsThere is a wide variation in the results as regards what patients believe gender-based violence is and what aspects it covers(AU)

[Knowledge of gender-based violence in the population seen in primary care]. / Conocimientos sobre violencia de género de la población que consulta en Atención Primaria.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the knowledge and attitudes towards gender-based violence in the Primary Care patient population and their relationship with sociodemographic factors and personal experience. DESIGN: A descriptive, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Urban Health Centres. PARTICIPANTS: Patients ≥18 years-old who were seen in a Primary Care clinic. MATERIALS AND METHOD: A questionnaire was used that included questions associated with knowledge, attitudes and experience of gender-based violence in the domestic environment. Variables such as, age, sex, education level, marital state were recorded, as well as the detection of personal experiences of Gender-Based Violence using the short Woman Abuse Screening Tool (WAST). RESULTS: A total of 673 people, from 18-86 years, responded, of which 68% were women. Only 18.2% had sufficient knowledge on who is considered to exercise gender-based violence. Half of the participants believed that gender-based violence included physical and psychological injuries, inhibition of freedom and rape. In the logistic regression analysis an independent relationship was found with the knowledge of the correct response on what is gender-based violence by marital state, being less likely in married people as regards widowers (OR: 0.28; CI 95%: 0.11-0.72), to consider that gender-based violence involves physical injury (OR: 2.55; CI 95%: 1.28-5.08), but not psychological injury (OR: 0.52; CI 95%: 0.28-0.96), and not giving the correct response on what is domestic violence (OR:0.06; CI 95%: 0.03-0.12). CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide variation in the results as regards what patients believe gender-based violence is and what aspects it covers.

Acercar la Medicina de Familia al estudiante: una tarea de todos / Bringing family medicine to the student: A job for everyone

No disponible

No disponible